ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2026
Reproducibility and Consistency of Methods to Define Hospital-Level Procedural Volume Thresholds for Pancreatectomy.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hospital volume stratification using stratum-specific likelihood ratios for pancreatectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionProcedural volume thresholds (VTs) for hospital quality reporting rely on expert consensus or analytic methods that may produce inconsistent VTs (e.g. restricted cubic splines (RCS), optimal cutpoints, classification and regression trees (CART), stratum specific likelihood ratios (SSLR)). The objective of this study was to compare variation in hospital-level VTs for pancreatectomy across multiple methodologies.
methodsPatients undergoing pancreatectomy from 2004 to 2021 were identified using the National Cancer Database. RCS, optimal cutpoints, CART, and SSLR were used to compute VTs based on 90-day mortality. From a single clinical data set, VTs were derived multiple times for each method by varying statistical parameters within each model.
resultsOverall, 61,920 patients underwent pancreatectomy at 982 hospitals. VTs associated with reductions in 90-day mortality ranged from 9.2 to 26.1 cases/year (RCS), 15.7-33.8 cases/year (optimal cutpoints), and 11-18 cases/year (CART), all based on modifiable statistical parameters. SSLR analysis yielded a singular VT of 21 cases/year without variability due to lack of statistical input.
conclusionAmong 4 common strategies for identifying VT that we studied, SSLR required the fewest assumptions. This may make it ideal for enhancing transparency and standardization in outcomes reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.