SynthesisResearch in nursing & health2026
Examining the Role of Discrimination in Prenatal Care Utilization: A Systematic Review Using the Social-Ecological Model.
Synthesis in Research in nursing & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Examining the Role of Discrimination in Prenatal Care Utilization: A Systematic Review Using the Social-Ecological Model.Research in nursing & health · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond Visit Counts: A Concept Analysis of Patient-Centered, Quality-Oriented Maternal and Child Healthcare Utilization.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely and adequate prenatal care (PNC) is essential for optimizing maternal and infant health outcomes. However, persistent disparities in PNC utilization exist in the United States, particularly among ethnic/racial minority populations. While discrimination has been recognized as a barrier, its multifaceted influence across social and structural contexts remains underexplored. This systematic review, guided by the Social-Ecological Model, synthesizes evidence on how various forms of discrimination affect PNC utilization. We conducted comprehensive searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL for peer-reviewed studies published in the United States between 2010 and 2024. After screening 342 records, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies employed qualitative methods, five used quantitative methods, and one utilized a mixed-methods approach. Findings revealed that structural discrimination, such as language barriers and institutional policies, was associated with delayed or insufficient PNC utilization. Interpersonal dynamics, including negative patient-provider interactions and implicit bias, discouraged engagement with care. Additionally, intrapersonal factors, like internalized discrimination, shaped perceptions of care quality and trust in healthcare systems. The review highlights how discrimination operates across multiple levels to influence PNC behaviors and outcomes. Addressing discrimination requires culturally responsive care models, provider training in cultural humility, and institutional reforms aimed at equity. Future research should explore protective factors, such as social support and resilience, that may buffer the negative effects of discrimination. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing interventions that promote equitable and effective PNC utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.