ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Flash Photodynamic Therapy - How the Saturation of Photosensitizer Absorption Enables Selective and Deeper Tumor Treatments.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flash Photodynamic Therapy - How the Saturation of Photosensitizer Absorption Enables Selective and Deeper Tumor Treatments.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted photodynamic diagnosis and photodynamic therapy against cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
FLASH therapies are attracting tremendous interest because they spare normal tissues while maintaining tumor-destroying efficacy, when compared with continuous delivery of radiation. In Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), it has been noted that continuous-wave and pulsed lasers give comparable results for a variety of tumors, but the conditions for increased tumor-to-peritumoral tissue selectivity have never been reported. This work presents a model that explains how pulsed lasers, in combination with photosensitizers, can offer selective and in-depth tumor ablation. It is shown that the photosensitizer absorption must be saturated to obtain the FLASH effect. The importance of the number of laser pulses to destroy tumor tissue and spare normal tissue is demonstrated. The predictions of the model and the superiority of FLASH-PDT are validated with the treatment of subcutaneous CT26 and orthotopic 4T1 tumors models. Notably, FLASH-PDT with redaporfin significantly increases the overall survival of mice with 4 mm orthotopic 4T1 tumors and lung metastasis. FLASH-PDT allows for the use of order-of-magnitude higher drug or light doses without affecting healthy tissues, while promoting selective and deeper tumor treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.