ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Neural Controlled Differential Equation and Its Application in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Empirical Bayes Variational Autoencoder-A Neural ODE Approach for Population Modeling in Pharmacology.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Neural Controlled Differential Equation and Its Application in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the recent advances in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), data-driven modeling approaches for pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) have gained popularity due to their versatility in diverse settings and reduced reliance on prior assumptions. However, most of the ML methods ignore the hidden dynamics behind the data, lacking interpretability. This study investigated the applicability of neural controlled differential equation (NCDE), a novel ML method that is suitable for data-driven modeling of PK and PD profiles, especially in the setting of multiple dosing. We demonstrated that NCDE was capable of combining differential-equation-based dynamics with data-driven characteristics, flexibly incorporating various types of inputs, and embedding discontinuous dynamics. Moreover, a direct correspondence was identified between the learned dynamics of NCDE and the dynamics behind the data, which highlights the intrinsic interpretability of NCDE. Additionally, the influence of important hyperparameters was systematically investigated, and it was found that L1 regularization and the AdaMax optimizer were useful for stabilizing the training process and leading to a generalizable NCDE model. Together, these findings demonstrate the accuracy, generalizability, and interpretability of NCDE, indicating that NCDE is a reliable method for further application. In the future, NCDE may further facilitate PK and PD prediction in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.