Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41241726›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Retrospective analysis of characteristics and transfer times of helicopter interhospital transfer of stroke patients: balancing air and ground transport efficiency.

Dominik Johannes Hoechter, Clemens Rieder, Leopold Kies, Florian Reifferscheid, Jörg Braun, Stephan Prückner, Suzette Heck, Andreas Bayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Helicopter emergency medical services for interfacility transfers: an Italian expert consensus.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Stroke care in the air: a new horizon for helicopter emergency medical services.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominik Johannes HoechterDepartment of Anaesthesiology, LMU University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. dominik.hoechter@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Clemens RiederDepartment of Anaesthesiology, LMU University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Leopold KiesScientific research department, German Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", Rita-Maiburg-Straße 2, D-70794, Filderstadt, Germany.
Florian ReifferscheidScientific research department, German Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", Rita-Maiburg-Straße 2, D-70794, Filderstadt, Germany.
Jörg BraunScientific research department, German Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", Rita-Maiburg-Straße 2, D-70794, Filderstadt, Germany.
Stephan PrücknerGerman Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", air base Munich, Elisabeth-Stöber-Straße 71, D-81377, Munich, Germany.
Suzette HeckDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Andreas BayerGerman Air Rescue Service Association "DRF Luftrettung", air base Munich, Elisabeth-Stöber-Straße 71, D-81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOngoing changes in the hospital landscape, combined with evolving patient transfer modalities, are reshaping acute care pathways. This study analyzed the medical needs of transferred stroke patients and assessed the potential time advantage of helicopter transport in this shifting context.

methodsA retrospective analysis of all interhospital helicopter transfers for patients with suspected or confirmed stroke conducted by one HEMS service between 2012 and 2020 was performed. Patient characteristics, medical interventions, and transfer times were extracted from the operational database. Helicopter transfer times were compared to calculated ambulance driving times, which were estimated using Google Maps data adjusted by a correction factor accounting for driving with lights and sirens.

resultsOut of 179,000 total missions, 7,528 were interhospital stroke transfers. Among these, 6,273 patients (83.3%) were classified as NACA 3 or 4, and 1,154 (13.3%) required mechanical ventilation. 2,227 patients (29.6%) received no medical intervention during transport. Complete transfer times and distances were available for 5,243 missions. The median total flight time-from alert to landing at the receiving hospital-was 49 min (IQR 37-63), compared to a median calculated driving time of 54 min (IQR 44-67). In 1,873 cases (62.8%), the total flight time was shorter than the estimated driving time, with a median time difference of - 3.4 min (IQR - 14.1 to + 7.3).

conclusionsSince many stroke patients required no interventions during transport, careful patient selection could help reserve specialized transfer resources for the most critical cases. While air transport provided a time advantage for patients in many cases, it was not always the fastest mode of transfer. Future design of emergency medical resources and dispatch strategies should be guided by the estimated time of patient arrival at the accepting hospitals.

Indexed as

Air AmbulancesPatient TransferStrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAir-based transportDispatchGround transportHEMSInterfacility transportInterhospital transportStroke

Identifiers

PMID41241726
PMCPMC12619459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.