Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41241719›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2025

Genomic insights into ST85 and ST158 belonging to recently emerged global clones of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Egypt: in vitro assessment of repurposed drug-antibiotic combinations.

Mona S El Far, Mervat A Kassem, Eva A Edward, Benjamin A Evans, Dave J Baker, Azza S Zakaria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mona S El FarDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, El-Khartoom Square, Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mervat A KassemDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, El-Khartoom Square, Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt.
Eva A EdwardDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, El-Khartoom Square, Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt.
Benjamin A EvansNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Dave J BakerQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, UK.
Azza S ZakariaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, El-Khartoom Square, Azarita, Alexandria, Egypt. azza.hanafy@alexu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe strikingly rapid increase in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB) incidence rates represents a major challenge in healthcare settings. This is due to the limitation of the currently available treatment options to combat tenacious A. baumannii infections. MDRAB isolates belonging to recently emerged global clones GC9 and GC10 are on the rise, especially in the Middle East and Africa, which warrants a thorough investigation of these global clones.

methodsThirteen A. baumannii isolates belonging to less well-studied global clones were selected from 46 isolates collected in Alexandria, Egypt, after determining their clone using MLST. Susceptibility to multiple antibiotic classes was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Testing of carbapenemase activity and selected virulence phenotypes was done. Whole genome sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, and molecular characterization of the resistance and virulence genotypes were performed. Checkerboard assay was employed for testing the combination of each of ciclopirox and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), as potential repurposed drugs, with each of meropenem and levofloxacin antibiotics against MDRAB isolates.

resultsAll the isolates displayed multidrug resistance and were carbapenemase-positive. One isolate showed strong biofilm formation, whereas 4 and 8 isolates were moderate and weak biofilm formers, respectively. Twelve out of thirteen isolates were positive twitchers. The isolates showed moderate phospholipase and strong protease activities. However, low phospholipase production was detected in one isolate. The genomic analysis revealed that 3 and 10 isolates belonged to ST85 (GC9) and ST158 (GC10), respectively. All 13 isolates harbored multiple resistance genes including oxa23 and carried an RP-T1 rep type plasmid. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the isolates were clustered together forming subclades with others from Alexandria/Egypt. The AbGRI3-2 resistance island (RI) was detected in ST158 isolates carrying R3-T60 rep type and 9 antibiotic resistance genes. The combination of NAC with each of meropenem or levofloxacin showed a synergistic action against 3 and one isolate(s), respectively, using the checkerboard assay.

conclusionThe current study provides an in-depth characterization of the collected MDRAB isolates from the global clones GC9 and GC10. The endemicity of these clones necessitates strategies to mitigate ongoing MDRAB outbreaks in countries like Egypt. Combination of NAC with meropenem or levofloxacin represents a promising treatment option against the newly emerged global clones that needs further in vivo testing.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesDrug RepositioningEgyptGenome, BacterialGenotypeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingPhylogenyVirulenceWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseAcinetobacter baumanniiCheckerboard assayMultidrug-resistantN-AcetylcysteinePhylogenetic analysisRepurposed drugsST158ST85WGS

Identifiers

PMID41241719
PMCPMC12619396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.