ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Optimizing neutralization strategies for microbial testing of non-sterile pharmaceutical finished products with challenging method suitability.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity, Toxicity, and Stability ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Translational Barriers to Pharmaceutical Excipient Readiness in Marine-Derived Polymers.Polymers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethod suitability for microbial limit tests during microbiological quality control (QC) can be a complicated process that requires multiple steps of optimization and plays a central role in ensuring reliable QC results. When antimicrobial activity of a given product cannot be neutralized, it is assumed that the inhibited microorganism is not present in the product, as specified by the U.S. pharmacopeia. This can potentially lead to contaminants that can multiply during storage or use, resulting in potential health risks or even death.
methodsMethod suitability testing was performed on a total of 133 pharmaceutical finished products as part of microbiological QC testing performed prior to product marketing. For total microbial count, depending on the pharmaceutical dosage form, testing included sequential trials of different dilution factors up to 1:200, the addition of 1-5% tween (polysorbate) 80, 0.7% lecithin, and/or filtration using different membrane filter types until the optimal method was selected for each product. Method suitability for microbial limit tests as well as for absence of specific pathogens was verified using a range of bacteria and fungi including Burkholderia cepacia.
resultsThere was an acceptable microbial recovery of at least 84% for all standard strains with all neutralization methods, demonstrating minimal to no toxicity. Forty of 133 finished products required multiple steps of optimization. Of these, 18 were neutralized through 1:10 dilution with diluent warming. Another 8 had no inherent antimicrobial activity to their API and were neutralized through dilution and the addition of tween 80. Neutralization of the remaining 13 products (mostly antimicrobial drugs) was achieved through variations of different dilution factors and filtration with different membrane filter types with multiple rinsing steps.
conclusionOur results provide detailed protocols that can help guide method suitability testing of finished pharmaceutical products for which neutralization proves challenging. We also include testing for B. cepacia complex in aqueous dosage form, often overlooked in the QC process. Since the current QC practice mostly assumes that these products do not require further testing, similar studies are especially needed to ensure the safety of finished pharmaceutical products during marketing, storage, and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.