ArticleSpinal cord2026
Prevalence of prescribed opioid claims among persons with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designCohort study.
objectivesTo determine the prevalence and to identify predictors of prescription opioid use among persons with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction within one year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.
settingOntario, Canada.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data to determine predictors of receiving prescription opioids during the one year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation among persons with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2015. We modelled the outcome using a Poisson multivariable regression and reported relative risks with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsWe identified 3468 individuals with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction (50.35% male) with 66.58% who were aged ≥66. Over half of the cohort (59.46%) received opioids during the observation period. Being female, previous opioid use before rehabilitation, increasing comorbidity level, low functional status, and having a previous diagnosis of osteoarthritis were significant risk factors for receiving opioids after discharge, as shown in an adjusted multivariable analysis. Increasing length of rehabilitation stay was protective against opioid receipt after discharge. Risk of receiving opioids varied with age. Younger individuals had a significantly higher risk of future opioid use, a risk that peaked around 30-40 years of age (aRR 1.54, 95% CI 1.42-1.67 for age 40, as compared to age 80). Risk of opioid use following discharge decreased as age increased beyond 40 years, as compared to age 80.
conclusionsMany individuals with non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction in Ontario are prescribed opioids after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. This may be problematic due to the number of severe complications that may arise from opioid use and their use in this population warrants future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41241697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.