SynthesisThe Angle orthodontist2026
Effectiveness of deciduous molar anchorage for rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate dentoskeletal effectiveness of deciduous molar anchorage in rapid maxillary expansion (RME) during mixed dentition. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to March 2025, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Included studies comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs assessing RME anchored to deciduous molars in patients with mixed dentition. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using ROB2 for RCTs and ROBINS-I for non-RCTs. Data were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis, focusing on dental and skeletal expansion. Results: Seventeen studies (six RCTs, 11 retrospective) met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 12 studies demonstrated significant transverse changes in all evaluated areas: deciduous canines (4.27 mm), deciduous molars (5.51 mm), permanent molars (3.93 mm), and skeletal expansion (2.59 mm). Notably, dental expansion significantly exceeded skeletal expansion. Subgroup analyses comparing Haas and Hyrax expanders revealed no statistically significant differences in dentoskeletal expansion outcomes. However, heterogeneity across studies ranged from moderate to high. ROB assessments indicated moderate risk in all RCTs, whereas non-RCTs ranged from low to serious risk. Funnel plot inspection revealed no substantial asymmetry, suggesting a low likelihood of publication bias. Conclusions: This meta-analysis confirms that deciduous molar anchorage in RME significantly increases dentoskeletal transverse dimensions. No significant differences emerged between appliance designs (Haas vs Hyrax). Despite consistent expansion effectiveness, variability in study design and ROB must be considered when interpreting these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.