Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41241320›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2026

Reconstitution of thymopoiesis via implantation of cryopreserved cultured thymus tissue into athymic recipients.

Laura P Hale, Dawn E Bowles, Jie Li, Andrew N Macintyre, NiDajah Bolden, Joanne Kurtzberg, Cathlyn K Medina, Berk Aykut, Elisabeth T Tracy, Joseph W Turek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura P HaleDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: laura.hale@duke.edu.
Dawn E BowlesDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jie LiDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Andrew N MacintyreHuman Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
NiDajah BoldenHuman Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Joanne KurtzbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Marcus Center for Cellular Cures, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Cathlyn K MedinaSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Berk AykutDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Elisabeth T TracyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Joseph W TurekDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Fish · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Regional Biocontainment Laboratory (RBL)UC6AI058607 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, R SANDERS · 2003 to 2005
$16.3M
Resources and Workforce Development for the Regional Biocontainment LaboratoriesUC7AI180254 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Herman F Staats · 2023 to 2026
$14.0M
Regional Biocontainment Laboratories Facility and Building System Upgrades SupportG20AI167200 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STAATS, HERMAN F · 2021 to 2022
$6.6M
Transplantation of Cryopreserved ThymusR21AI175164 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HALE, LAURA P., TUREK, JOSEPH · 2023 to 2024
$443k
Inducing Xenotolerance via Chimeric ThymusR21AI187688 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Laura P. Hale, Joseph Turek · 2025 to 2026
$438k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NIAID NIH HHS G20 AI167200NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI175164NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI187688NIAID NIH HHS UC6 AI058607NIAID NIH HHS UC7 AI180254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantation of cultured allogeneic thymus tissue (CTTI) into athymic human recipients generates functional recipient-derived naïve T cells that are tolerant to the donor. Currently, CTTI is always performed with 12 to 21 days of thymus procurement to avoid culture-related changes that could be detrimental to its reconstitution potential. We demonstrate here that cultured thymus tissue can be cryopreserved and still maintain its viability and reconstitution potential. Implantation of cryopreserved cultured rat thymus tissue (cCTTI) under the renal capsule of congenitally athymic rats results in colonization of the thymus implant with T cell progenitors and population of the periphery with genetically-recipient naïve T cells. Similarly, cCTTI of porcine thymus into the quadriceps muscle of thymectomized T cell-depleted pigs results in full reconstitution of the implanted thymus. Human thymus tissues that are similarly cultured and cryopreserved continue to meet the same implantation quality criteria as freshly cultured thymus tissue. Clinical trials are warranted to test the potential of cCTTI to decouple the current links between time of procurement and implantation. This would extend the benefits of immune reconstitution and tolerance induction to a broader range of patients.

Indexed as

CryopreservationThymus GlandT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansRatsRats, NudeSwinecryopreservationthymustransplantation

Identifiers

PMID41241320
PMCPMC12805834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.