ArticleRespiratory medicine2025
Theratyping as a tool to guide clinical decision-making in patients with suspected cystic fibrosis and variants currently ineligible for CFTR modulator therapy.
Article in Respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The combination of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) is effective in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) with at least one F508del-CFTR allele; however, approximately 10% have variants without established ETI responsiveness and are ineligible for therapy. Additionally, diagnostic confirmation or exclusion of CF can be challenging in individuals with compatible symptoms, CFTR variants of unknown significance, and indeterminate sweat chloride or nasal potential difference (NPD) results. We implemented a minimally invasive method for "theratyping" in subjects with confirmed or clinically suspected CF and a CFTR variant currently ineligible for ETI therapy. We derived air-liquid interface epithelia from airway basal cells obtained via nasal brushings; we then assessed CFTR function at baseline and in response to ETI with Ussing chambers. We present six cases highlighting the value of our theratyping approach in guiding clinical decision-making. In two subjects, theratyping demonstrated substantial improvement in CFTR function and supported approval for ETI therapy, with subsequent clinical improvements in airway mechanics, weight maintenance, microbiology, and symptom burden. Conversely, theratyping identified two subjects with CF unlikely to respond to ETI, suggesting they may be candidates for future trials of new therapeutics. Finally, in two subjects with suspected CF, theratyping demonstrated normal-range CFTR function and decreased suspicion for CF. This work highlights our theratyping approach as a practical strategy for 1) predicting ETI response in people with CF and CFTR variant currently ineligible for ETI therapy and 2) aiding in the diagnostic confirmation or exclusion of CF in cases with inconclusive sweat chloride or NPD results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.