ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2026
Nanoparticle-mediated bone regeneration: From molecular mechanisms to clinical translation.
Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Bench to Bone: Translational Pathways of Nanomaterial-Based Therapies in Craniomaxillomandibulofacial and Cranial Vault Reconstruction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reimagining Spinal Surgery at the Nanoscale: Smart Implants, Targeted Therapies, and Translational Challenges.Biology · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Personalized Bioceramic Scaffolds for Dental and Maxillofacial Applications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- A zingiberene-selenium nanoparticle formulation modulates oxidative, inflammatory, and osteogenic responses during femoral fracture healing in rats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Epoxomicin-functionalized thermosensitive hydrogel rescues bone defects in osteoporosis by the NF-κB signaling pathway.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstruction of critical-size bone defects remains a persistent clinical challenge after trauma, tumour resection and degenerative disease. Nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as versatile platforms that couple tunable material properties with targeted molecular delivery to direct regeneration. This review synthesizes advances from the past decade across inorganic (for example, nanostructured hydroxyapatite and bioactive glasses), polymeric, lipid, and bioinspired NPs, and links key design parameters-size, shape, mechanics, surface chemistry and degradability-to osteogenic outcomes. We examine how NPs steer stem-cell fate through mechanotransduction and canonical signaling (Wnt/β-catenin, BMP/Smad, MAPK), and highlight emerging mechanisms including controlled ion release, redox modulation, protein-corona dynamics and macrophage immune reprogramming toward pro-healing phenotypes. Three key modes of translational application are emphasized: NPs as carriers for proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules; as bioactive or reinforcing components within load-bearing scaffolds; and as injectable microenvironments that provide spatiotemporal control of cell signaling cues. Ongoing clinical applications in dental, orthopedic and spinal therapeutics show growing adoption, while also revealing gaps in long-term safety, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), and regulation. In future developments, stimuli-responsive and self-reporting nanomaterials, informed by AI-guided design and integrated with 3D bioprinting, offer routes to patient-specific grafts with predictable performance. By consolidating mechanisms into practical design rules, we chart a path from tunable nanoscale interfaces to reliable, clinically impactful bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.