ArticleThe Science of the total environment2025
Predicting arsenic and manganese contamination in private well water with Machine Learning: An integrated analysis of geologic, well construction, and permitting data.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting arsenic and manganese contamination in private well water with Machine Learning: An integrated analysis of geologic, well construction, and permitting data.The Science of the total environment · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure to arsenic (As) and manganese (Mn) through private well water is a pressing public health issue in North Carolina (NC). The goal of this study was to identify geologic, geographic, well construction, and water characteristics (e.g. pH) that are predictive of As and Mn concentrations in private wells. Data collected from over 700 private well water tests from Union County, NC, were analyzed, including thirteen variables spanning well construction and water characteristics that were joined with geologic and geographic features. These data were used to develop random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models to predict whether wells exceeded their respective maximum contaminant level (MCL) or health advisory level (HAL) (10 ppb for As; 300 ppb for Mn) using four different variable combinations (use cases). Major findings included that As and Mn contamination was prevalent with 18 % and 12 % of tested wells exceeding the MCL and HAL, respectively. Most algorithms across the use cases had generally high predictivity (AUC > 0.7). The top performing models used a linear kernel SVM that leveraged all thirteen variables for As (AUC = 0.80) and the geologic/geographic variables for Mn (AUC = 0.74). When classifying As concentrations, longitude, flow rate, pH, and land use were the most important predictors of contamination. When classifying Mn concentrations, casing depth, longitude, and latitude were the most important predictors. In conclusion, these findings can be used to inform the identification of private wells at-risk for metal contamination, prioritize intervention efforts for existing wells, and provide safer parameters for newly constructed wells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.