ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2025
Policing and access to harm reduction services among young people who use drugs and young Indigenous people who use drugs before and after the pilot implementation of decriminalization of personal possession.
Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOn January 31, 2023, the province of British Columbia, Canada, implemented a pilot decriminalization of personal possession of certain drugs. This study investigated temporal trends in policing-related barriers to accessing harm reduction services among young people who use drugs (PWUD) in Vancouver before and after decriminalization.
methodsData from 2021-2024 were collected from an open prospective cohort of street-involved young PWUD. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations (GEE) assessed trends in self-reported policing-related barriers to harm reduction services before and after decriminalization, with calendar time and decriminalization (plus their interaction) as primary explanatory variables. A sub-analysis was conducted among participants who identified as being of Indigenous ancestry.
resultsAmong 319 participants, the median baseline age was 28.0 years, and 83 (26 %) reported policing-related barriers to harm reduction services at some point during the study period. In multivariable GEE analysis, an increasing trend in reporting police barriers was observed before decriminalization (adjusted per-year odds ratio [AOR]=2.41; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-4.51). At the implementation of decriminalization, a significant level drop of 65 % was observed (AOR=0.35; 95 % CI: 0.15-0.82), with no trend observed post-decriminalization (AOR=1.12; 95 % CI: 0.48-2.58 per year). In sub-analysis among Indigenous participants, a significant decreasing trend of 72 % per year in reported policing-related barriers was observed in the post-decriminalization period (AOR = 0.28; 95 % CI: 0.08-0.97). IMPLICATIONS: Among young PWUD, we observed relative reductions in experiencing policing-related barriers to harm reduction services after the pilot implementation of decriminalization, and this benefit extended to young Indigenous PWUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.