Observational studyBiological trace element research2026
Sample Size and Optimal Timing for Urine Collection Based on Diurnal Variability of Urinary Iodine/Creatinine Ratio in Pregnant Women.
Observational study in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond iodine nutrition: socioeconomic patterns independently drive thyroid disease risk in pregnant women in Xinjiang.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary iodine concentration (UIC) is influenced by variable urine volume, undermining its reliability. The urinary iodine/creatinine ratio (UI/Cr) may provide a more stable measure, especially in pregnancy. This study aimed to explore the variation of UI/Cr in assessing iodine status in pregnant women, and determine the sample size and optimal sampling time for accurate assessment. Thirteen pregnant women participated in a seven-day iodine metabolism study. All urine samples from each participant were collected separately over the 7-day period, and urinary iodine and urinary creatinine were tested. Spot UIC was positively correlated with time interval (β = 12.09, P < 0.001). UI/Cr, an indicator corrected for volume effect, showed no significant effect with time interval (β = -3.00, P = 0.090). The CV of UI/Cr was lower than UIC at both individual (56.16% vs. 73.15%) and population levels (62.41% vs. 84.75%). With a 95% confidence interval and ± 20% precision, an individual needs 33 urine samples, while a population requires 39 samples. The mixed-effects model analysis revealed that spot UI/Cr during the 18:00-23:59 period exhibited the strongest correlation with 24-hour UI/Cr (β = 0.62, P < 0.001). Additionally, spot UI/Cr during the 12:00-17:59 period demonstrated the strongest correlation with 24-hour urinary iodine excretion (β = 0.61, P < 0.001). The UI/Cr provides a more reliable estimate of iodine status than UIC. To obtain a precision of ± 20%, 33 spot-urine samples are required for individual assessment and 39 for population-level evaluation. We recommend urine collection between 12:00 and 18:00 for accurate evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41240297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.