ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of left atrial and left ventricular venting: pitfalls and troubleshooting in over 300 cases.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Left ventricular perforation associated with vent catheter insertion without transesophageal echocardiography guidance.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLeft atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) venting during open-heart surgery is essential for myocardial protection, maintaining a bloodless field, and facilitating air removal. However, catheter malposition and inadequate venting are not uncommon because of limited visibility. Although transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can assist in catheter monitoring, TEE-guided management strategies remain underreported. This study aimed to characterize catheter-related issues and describe effective troubleshooting approaches.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed intraoperative TEE findings in 304 patients who underwent open-heart surgery at Kochi University Hospital, including 200 with LV venting and 104 with LA venting. TEE records of catheter-related events and corrective maneuvers were reviewed, and challenges in TEE assessment were identified.
resultsNo catheter-related injuries were observed. In the LV group, TEE identified failure of ventricular entry (n = 5), impingement on papillary muscles or the apex (n = 18), and catheter-induced mitral regurgitation (n = 11). Residual air was frequently localized distant from the catheter tip. In the LA group, misplacement into pulmonary veins (n = 9) or the left atrial appendage (LAA) (n = 2) was noted. Venting was ineffective in cases of acute LV distension during antegrade cardioplegia or due to Thebesian venous return. In some cases, deep catheter placement resulted in incomplete drainage of the right-sided LA.
conclusionsBoth LA and LV venting have distinct pitfalls. TEE facilitates identification and correction of catheter-related problems, but structured training in TEE assessment is essential to optimize outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41240291What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.