ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2025
Assessing the Utility of Mental Health Training of Primary Care Professionals and Psychologists in the Dominican Republic.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2017, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) conducted a survey in Jarabacoa, Dominican Republic that revealed a high rate of mental health disorders. To address the shortage of mental health services, ISMMS collaborated with the Instituto Terapéutico y Psicológico para la Familia (INTEP) to provide training sessions to local primary care providers (PCPs) and psychologists in psychopharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the training on providers' confidence about and attitudes towards providing mental health care. Trainees were administered a survey pre, immediate post, and three-months following training sessions to assess their comfort in diagnosing and treating psychiatric conditions. Post-training interviews were conducted to assess the impact of the training. A total of 78 PCPs participated in the initial training session. Chi-squared and Fisher Exact analyses conducted on PCPs' responses to individual survey items revealed significant increases in the proportion of respondents agreeing to feeling comfortable managing targeted psychiatric conditions after training as compared to before training. Interviews with 28 PCPs supported these results. Five of the 12 trained psychologists were interviewed and endorsed success in integrating the training into their practice, noting improved patient outcomes. Both PCPs and psychologists described an enhanced sense of confidence in managing patients with mental health disorders after training, emphasizing the positive impact that psychiatric training initiatives in primary care settings have in promoting sustainable mental healthcare systems in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41240249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.