ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Hemodynamic differences between intracranial and extracranial dissecting aneurysms: An analysis of shear forces and their clinical implications.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial carotid dissecting aneurysms (DA) are often treated emergently upon diagnosis. In contrast, extracranial DA are generally considered less likely to rupture and are commonly managed conservatively. Despite these clinical differences, limited data exists on the hemodynamic differences that might explain their divergent clinical behaviors. Retrospective analysis of intracranial and extracranial DA treated between 2011 to 2023. DA were reconstructed from computerized angiographic images using 3D Slicer software. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed using ANSYS® Fluent package. Hemodynamic parameters calculated included time averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), high shear areas (HSA), low shear areas (LSA), time averaged wall shear stress ratio (TAWSR), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT). We compared these variables between extracranial and intracranial lesions using Mann-Whitney U and t-tests. Nineteen DA (10 extracranial, 9 intracranial) from 16 patients (age 48-82; 9 male) were analyzed. The average volume and area of the lesions evaluated were 187 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
41240205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.