SynthesisVeterinary research communications2025
Systematic review of the prevalence of Gastrointestinal helminths in ruminants in Mexico.
Synthesis in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Mexico, the abundance of endoparasites that affect the health of ruminants and the economy of the farmer, so the objective of this review was to determine the prevalence of the main genera and species of ruminant helminths that have been identified in Mexico in the last 37 years. A systematic search was carried out following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and supported by the Elsevier platform (Scopus and ScienceDirect), Google Scholar, Redalyc and Scielo tools. In addition, information was sought in the proceedings Congress of the Buiatrics and Veterinary Parasitologists. A database was created with 36 documents containing information on the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in Mexico. Research studies that included treatments that affected prevalence were not included, nor were those of an experimental nature that did not aim to study prevalence. The prevalence for Haemonchus contortus, the main abomasal nematode in ruminants, was 38.8%. In the case of Mecistocirrus, only four studies indicated the prevalence in cattle, which was estimated at 40.5%. In the small intestine, the most prevalent nematode in cattle were Cooperia and Strongyloides. In goats and sheep, the presence of Trichostrongylus, and Toxocara were indicated. The main cecal nematodes include Trichuris and in the colon Oesophagostomum and Chabertia. The high prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes in ruminants makes it essential to consider control measures to reduce their prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.