SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Stereotactic radiosurgery for craniopharyngioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Craniopharyngiomas are rare, benign tumors with challenging management due to their proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important treatment modality for residual or recurrent cases; however, its efficacy and safety profile require continued assessment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the outcomes of SRS in craniopharyngioma. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted up to May 2025 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included ≥ 3 patients with > 6 months of follow-up, and reporting on SRS outcomes. Key endpoints were pooled using a random-effects model, and meta-regression was performed to identify outcome moderators. Thirty-two studies encompassing 926 patients were included. The pooled overall tumor control rate was 76.1% (95% CI: 68.6-82.3%). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 81.3% (95% CI: 70.8-88.6%) at 3 years and 68.9% (95% CI: 58.5-76.0%) at 5 years. Meta-regression identified cystic tumor composition as a significant predictor of lower PFS, while prior surgery was associated with improved 3-year PFS. Overall survival remained high at 92.7% (95% CI: 88.0-96.1%). Visual improvement occurred in 11.3% of patients (95% CI: 6.3-19.5%). Serious complication rates were low, including visual deterioration (7.4%), hypothalamic dysfunction (0.7%), and new-onset pituitary dysfunction (2.2%). These findings indicate that SRS achieves favorable tumor control and overall survival with a low incidence of major complications in patients with craniopharyngioma. Tumor composition and treatment history significantly influence outcomes, highlighting the importance of individualized patient selection. These findings support the role of SRS as a key modality in the management of residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41240129What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.