Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41240105›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Anodal tDCS over the supplementary motor area increases motor overflow during imagined aiming movement.

Judith Bek, Xiaoye Michael Wang, Timothy N Welsh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Judith BekFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Judith.Bek@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-1788
Xiaoye Michael WangFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Timothy N WelshFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101034345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural networks subserving motor imagery and action observation overlap with those involved in motor execution. The precise roles of specific cortical areas in these processes are not fully understood. One cortical area implicated in motor imagery is the supplementary motor area (SMA). To test the role of SMA in motor imagery, participants without any known neurological disorders (N = 23) completed three versions of a reciprocal manual aiming task (imagined, observed, and executed movements) before and after transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied to the SMA. Anodal, cathodal, and sham (inactive) stimulation protocols were compared within participants. Although the speed-accuracy trade-off observed in the aiming task was not affected by tDCS, the amount of incidental movement during imagery (motor overflow) increased following anodal stimulation. Additionally, imagined movement time was associated less strongly with an implicit measure of motor imagery (hand laterality judgement) following anodal tDCS compared to the sham condition. No effects of tDCS were found for action observation or movement execution. These results suggest that anodal stimulation applied over SMA may subtly disrupt processes underlying motor imagery, either through unintended inhibitory effects or via excitatory effects on adjacent areas of the motor cortex.

Indexed as

ImaginationMotor CortexPsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung AdultAction observationMotor imageryMotor simulationSupplementary motor areaTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.