ReviewPsychopharmacology2026
Clinical and preclinical evidence of sex differences in nicotine-induced enhancement of alcohol self-administration.
Review in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleAlcohol and nicotine are frequently co-used, with significant implications for public health, particularly for women. Nicotine is known to enhance the response to other reinforcers in the immediate environment, including alcohol. Although many studies have examined the potential intersections of alcohol and nicotine use, few have directly examined any potential sex differences in the ability of nicotine to potentiate the reward and reinforcement of alcohol.
objectiveSummarize all extant evidence from clinical and preclinical studies that have investigated nicotine-induced enhancement of alcohol self-administration in male and/or female subjects, with a particular focus on studies that have directly assessed sex differences. METHODS AND
resultsWe obtained relevant studies from PubMed and GoogleScholar, selecting only studies in which alcohol self-administration occurred under the influence of passively-administered nicotine. We identified five clinical studies and 20 preclinical studies that matched our inclusion criteria, and only a subset of those studies directly examined male and female subjects. Although the collected evidence from these studies is limited, we discuss substantial evidence from other studies exhibiting sex differences in the neuropsychobiological mechanisms by which nicotine can modulate alcohol-related behaviors.
conclusionsBy highlighting the limited number of studies that have directly assessed sex differences in nicotine-induced enhancement of alcohol self-administration, we propose different avenues to address the gaps in the literature. Since rising rates of alcohol use disorder and nicotine-alcohol co-use disproportionately impact women, future research should prioritize mechanistic explorations and translational paradigms to tailor therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41240074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.