ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2026
Association of Janus kinase inhibitors with reduced depression in alopecia areata.
Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When hair dig into the brain, JAKi, may help!Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
- Association of Janus kinase inhibitors with reduced depression in alopecia areata.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
- JAK Inhibitors for Alopecia Areata: Approved Therapies, Efficacy, and Unanswered Questions.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlopecia areata (AA) is associated with a significant psychological burden, particularly an increased risk of major depressive disorder (MDD). Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are emerging as an effective treatment for AA, yet their impact on MDD risk remains unclear. Understanding this association could inform treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes.
objectivesThis study aimed to determine if treatment with JAK inhibitors is associated with a reduced incidence of MDD in AA patients compared to those receiving other treatments or no treatment.
methodsThis study utilized the TriNetX international healthcare database, including patients diagnosed with AA between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on JAK inhibitor use within 6 months after AA diagnosis. Propensity score matching ensured balanced groups across observed covariates. The primary outcome was MDD diagnosis between 6 months and 5 years after AA diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included new antidepressant prescriptions.
resultsAfter matching, 1838 patients in each group (conventional treatments with or without JAK inhibitors) were analysed. Treatment with JAK inhibitors was significantly associated with a lower risk of MDD [aHR: 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.82, p = 0.009] and antidepressant prescriptions (aHR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.32-0.67, p < 0.001). These findings were consistent across 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year periods. Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations in younger patients (18-29 years), those of White ethnicity, and those treated at academic medical centres.
conclusionsThis study shows that JAK inhibitor treatment in AA patients is associated with a significantly lower incidence of MDD and reduced antidepressant use. These findings suggest a potential role for JAK inhibitor in improving mental health in AA. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and explore the long-term safety and benefits of JAK inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.