ArticleJournal of neuropsychology2026
Comparison of the Tele-Oxford Cognitive Screen to a neuropsychological battery in chronic stroke survivors.
Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following an increased need for remote cognitive screening solutions, we aimed to investigate the construct validity and determine initial sensitivity/specificity estimates of the Tele-OCS, a stroke-specific remotely administered cognitive screening tool. To this end, a secondary data analysis is presented from 98 stroke survivors from the OX-CHRONIC longitudinal study (average 4.5 years. post-stroke). Convergent validity was examined for overall Tele-OCS performance against MoCA total score, and separately for each of the subtasks against matched neuropsychological tasks. Divergent validity was examined against different neuropsychological tests and presumed to be unrelated self-reported anxiety, as measured with HADS-A. Overall, we found that the Tele-OCS subtasks had good convergent/divergent validity. All subtasks also showed excellent specificity (min 80%), and whilst the cancellation task also showed good sensitivity (80%), all other subtasks came at a cost of lower sensitivity, compared to a more sensitive neuropsychological assessment. The Tele-OCS provides a brief, remote, first-line cognitive screening tool that reliably detects cognitive changes where these are clearly present, specifically and validly measuring distinct cognitive domains, which contrasts with a domain-general cognitive screening approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.