Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239888›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2025

"A Million Miles From How They Used to be": Understanding Conversations From the Perspective of People with Dementia, Family, and Professionals.

Alex Stirling, Catrin Hedd Jones, Suzanne Beeke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex StirlingDepartment of Language and Cognition, University College London (UCL), London, England.ORCID 0009-0006-0139-8630
Catrin Hedd JonesAssociation for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, England.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-0777
Suzanne BeekeDepartment of Language and Cognition, University College London (UCL), London, England.ORCID 0000-0002-6772-2820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia causes conversational difficulties for the person and those close to them due to the ubiquity of language and cognitive problems. Little is known about the experience of conversations from the perspective of people with dementia and their conversation partners (CPs). This study aims to understand experiences of conversations through consultation with people with dementia, those close to them, and dementia professionals, and how people are supported when they experience difficulties communicating. Nine people with a range of dementia diagnoses and six CPs (spouses), all community-dwelling, attended an in-person focus group in one of two locations. Sixteen dementia professionals attended online focus groups. Focus groups were recorded and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: the impact of conversation changes for the person with dementia and CP, conversation and dementia identity, support for conversation, and conversation and person-centred care. Language and memory changes impacted conversations and relationships. Societal stigma also affected conversations. Support for conversation was perceived to be scarce. The need for education and training to equip families to maintain conversation was emphasised. Supporting conversation was seen as fundamental to maintaining relationships and as a mechanism for professionals to deliver person-centred care.

Indexed as

community-dwellingconversationdementiaperson-centred caretrainingwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41239888
PMCPMC13683889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.