Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239764›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

The threshold of estradiol level for fresh embryo transfer differs between blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo.

Dingying Zhao, Huiying Xiao, Gege Ouyang, Yuan Fang, Qiaoqiao Ding, Yue Niu, Jialin Zou, Yanran Liu, Xue Shang, Ze Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dingying ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2761-098X
Huiying XiaoState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Gege OuyangState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yuan FangState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Qiaoqiao DingState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4460-4119
Yue NiuState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jialin ZouState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yanran LiuState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xue ShangState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Ze WangState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zi-Jiang ChenState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Lianlian LiuModel Animal Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Daimin WeiState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3455-2984

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2703502National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2705501National Natural Science Foundation of China 82421004National Natural Science Foundation of China 82495194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOvarian stimulation can cause supraphysiological estradiol levels and adverse effects on endometrial receptivity. Since patients could undergo cleavage or blastocyst stage embryo transfer, the threshold value of peak estradiol level for each transfer stage that impacts the pregnancy outcomes of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer remains unclear. This work aims at answering the following questions: what is the threshold of peak estradiol level that modifies the difference in pregnancy outcomes between fresh and frozen embryo transfer and whether the threshold value varies with the stage of embryo transferred? MATERIAL AND

methodsA secondary analysis of data from four multicenter randomized trials with similar design comparing the rate of live birth between fresh and frozen embryo transfer in a total of 6153 patients. Peak serum estradiol level was measured on the day of hCG administration. Live birth rate is the primary outcome.

resultsMultivariable regression modeling showed an interaction between the stage of embryo transferred and the intervention (frozen vs fresh embryo transfer) on the live birth rate (p = 0.016). In the cleavage-stage embryo transfer group, frozen embryo transfer resulted in a higher rate of live birth when peak estradiol level >3900 pg/mL (55.4% vs 44.9%; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.24-1.99) and a similar live birth rate (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93-1.31) when peak estradiol level was 1600-3900 pg/mL. However, in the blastocyst transfer group, frozen embryo transfers yielded a higher live birth rate when peak estradiol level >2000 pg/mL (54.3% vs 37.7%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.59-2.51).

conclusionsA freeze-all strategy may result in a higher rate of live birth when the peak estradiol level >3900 pg/mL for cleavage-stage embryo transfer and when the peak estradiol level >2000 pg/mL for blastocyst transfer.

Indexed as

BlastocystCleavage Stage, OvumEmbryo TransferEstradiolAdultCryopreservationFemaleHumansLive BirthOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEstradiolembryo transfer stagefreeze‐all strategyfresh embryo transferlive birthpeak estradiol level

Identifiers

PMID41239764
PMCPMC12856715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.