ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2026
Barriers to Accurate Diagnosis of Infantile Atopic Dermatitis: Insights From a Survey of Pediatricians.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis is essential for timely intervention in atopic dermatitis (AD), yet delays in diagnosis remain common. To better understand current clinical practices regarding infantile AD, a questionnaire survey was conducted among Japanese pediatricians working at medical institutions with 19 or fewer beds. Respondents who provided informed consent completed an online questionnaire that included items on screening practices, physician background, understanding of diagnostic and treatment practices, and recognition of key clinical issues. In total, 238 valid responses were analyzed. Most respondents indicated that they were non-allergists (85.7% of responses), aged 50 years or older (68.9% of responses) and reported high clinical experience in treating infantile eczema. Only 44.1% of respondents correctly recognized that AD is a condition within the collective term of infantile eczema. Almost all (92.0%) respondents correctly agreed that early intervention was effective for infantile AD and most recognized that AD treatment is prolonged, that AD induces other allergic diseases, and that AD is unlikely to resolve spontaneously in most cases. Understanding of the primary nature of AD was poor with 62.6% of respondents either incorrectly stating that AD is caused by other allergic diseases or that they did not know. The mean (SD) minimum age of AD diagnosis was 7.4 (4.81) months (median, 6.0 months) and 23.9% of physicians diagnosed AD after 1 year of age. Only 16.4% of respondents correctly identified a case of infantile AD and only 19.3% of respondents correctly selected the most appropriate treatment for a known case of infantile AD. Reluctance to inform parents/caregivers of an AD diagnosis was high and mostly due to anticipation of parental shock. Certain pediatricians in Japan have misunderstandings about infantile AD. Further awareness of infantile AD is necessary to ensure early diagnosis and intervention as well as management aligned with guideline recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.