ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Force-limited distance-measurable nerve root retractor plus intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring reduces L5 radiculitis in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the incidence of L5 radiculitis in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using a force-limited distance-measurable nerve root retractor (FLDM-NRR) combined with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), compared with conventional nerve root retraction.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study examined 234 patients with L4-L5 lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) undergoing single-level PLIF from January 2022 to March 2024. Patients were categorized into the FLDM-NRR plus IONM group (n = 96) with force limitation ≤ 3.5 N, and the conventional nerve root retraction group (n = 138). The primary outcome was 3-month L5 radiculitis; Secondary outcomes included 1-year persistent neurological impairment, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Multivariable logistic regression, mixed-effects models, and hierarchical testing were applied.
resultsFLDM-NRR with IONM reduced the 3-month L5 radiculitis incidence (7.29% vs 18.12%, adjusted OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.78; P = 0.017; absolute risk reduction (ARR) = 10.83%; number needed to treat (NNT) = 9), with greatest protection in the first postoperative week (3.13% vs 13.04%, P = 0.020). No significant difference was observed in 1-year persistent neurological impairment (3.13% vs 7.25% P = 0.200). The FLDM-NRR group showed superior ODI (18.43 ± 7.85% vs 21.17 ± 8.42%, P = 0.018) and higher MCID rates in VAS leg pain (95.8% vs 93.5%, P = 0.028). IONM demonstrated 85.71% sensitivity and 96.63% specificity in predicting postoperative complications. The FLDM-NRR system consistently upheld the predetermined force threshold in all instances without any device-related problems.
conclusionFLDM-NRR combined with IONM significantly reduces early L5 radiculitis after PLIF and provides short-term functional benefits. Long-term neuroprotection remains unproven and requires validation in prospective randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.