Observational studyBMC medical education2025
Development and evaluation of a systems-based point-of-care ultrasound curriculum for a master of science in athletic training program.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs an imaging modality, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) holds substantial value to health professionals who are adequately trained in its use. The athletic training profession is an allied health profession with significant potential to adopt POCUS in training and practice. However, published research on POCUS curricula for graduate entry-level programs in athletic training is lacking. Furthermore, there are no published studies of learning outcomes from POCUS courses for graduate entry-level athletic training students.
methodsWe developed a POCUS curriculum tailored for a graduate athletic training program. Following updated Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education standards, we described POCUS evaluation of select organ systems in the abdomen and thorax, as well as the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST) protocol. Course efficacy was assessed with a prospective observational study using a convenience sample of entry-level graduate athletic training students enrolled in our elective course. All (n = 15) students were starting the second year in a Master of Science in Athletic Training (MSAT) program. Pre-and post-course tests were administered to assess cognitive learning outcomes, and an imaging practical exam was developed to gauge students' psychomotor proficiency. In addition, students' experiences were evaluated with a post course survey in the following self-perceived domains: (1) confidence in their future education and clinical practice; (2) satisfaction with the course; and (3) confidence in their POCUS proficiency.
resultsStudents demonstrated significant learning in cognitive domains (pre-test average = 48%, post-test average = 73%, P < 0.001), displayed proficiency in congruence with our course objectives in a practical evaluation, reported satisfaction with a variety of course features, and gained confidence in POCUS skills. Notably, students were dissatisfied with the brevity of the course and displayed heterogeneous proficiency across applications.
conclusionsStudents in a professional MSAT program can develop meaningful knowledge and proficiency in the use of POCUS across organ systems following a brief elective. Additional training is needed to facilitate clinical implementation across the profession. Positive perceptions and self-confidence among students following POCUS training may help support POCUS adoption by athletic trainers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.