Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239469›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2025

Harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 for Lactobacillus improvement in silage production: current knowledge and future perspectives.

Jing Ma, Jiao Zhang, Xusheng Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing MaSchool of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730030, P.R. China.
Jiao ZhangSchool of Life Sciences and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730030, P.R. China. 294229027@xbmu.edu.cn.
Xusheng GuoSchool of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730030, P.R. China. guoxsh07@lzu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-3920

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U20A2002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality silage is the cornerstone to sustainable livestock development and animal food production. As the core fermentation bacteria of silage, Lactobacillus directly regulates silage fermentation by producing lactic acid, enzymes, and other bioactive molecules. However, traditional screening methods for functional strains are labor-intensive and time-consuming. Recent advances in synthetic biology, particularly the development of CRISPR-Cas genome editing technology, offer a revolutionary approach to designing Lactobacillus strains with customized traits. This review systematically reviewed the importance of silage in sustainable agricultural development and the limitations of current silage preparation and promotion. It also discussed the application of strain engineering approaches in optimizing the phenotypic performance of Lactobacillus for better silage. Building on this, we reviewed the research progress of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in Lactobacillus and discussed how to leverage its high efficiency and precision to optimize the strain's traits for improved silage quality and functionality. CRISPR-Cas9 toolkits are expected to achieve directed evolution of strain performance, ultimately yielding next-generation silage microbial inoculants with multiple functions, adaptability to multiple substrates, and eco-friendly characteristics. The use of such innovative biotechnologies would facilitate resource-efficient utilization, promote animal performance and health for sustainable development in livestock production.

Indexed as

Gene editingLactobacillus engineeringSilageSustainable livestock production

Identifiers

PMID41239469
PMCPMC12619495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.