ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Factors that influence the commissioning and implementation of integrated care for adults at risk of cardiovascular disease and mild-to-moderate mental health concerns in the UK: a systematic review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and mild-to-moderate mental health concerns (anxiety, depression) often co-occur and can worsen individual health outcomes, increase healthcare burden, and related costs relative to non-co/multi-morbidity. Existing evidence from both staff and service users suggests that integrating care for this population can be beneficial but challenging. Therefore, it is important that the key influences on integrated care are mapped to behavioural science frameworks so that intervention strategies in the system are actionable. This review aims to synthesise findings on which individual, organisational, social, and system-level factors influence integrated care for people experiencing co-occurring CVD risk factors and mild-to-moderate mental health concerns from the perspective of a range of health and social care professionals.
methodsThis systematic review will search MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and grey literature in PsyArXiv and HMIC. Included studies will be qualitative primary research published in the English language reporting on the factors that influence the commissioning and implementation of integrated care for adults at risk of CVD and experiencing mild-to-moderate mental health concerns. This will be from the perspective of healthcare professionals, managers, commissioners, and policymakers. A thematic synthesis will identify relevant actions, actors, context, targets, and timeframes using the AACTT framework, and influences on actors' behaviour will be mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). DISCUSSION: Data from this review will provide insight for a larger NHIR-funded programme of work that aims to optimise Integrated Care Services (OptICS) that will develop a whole-systems map to identify appropriate targets and intervention strategies to optimise integrated care. This review will offer a novel contribution to knowledge by synthesising qualitative evidence from a range of stakeholders on the influences on commissioning and implementation of integrated care for adults with physical and mental health comorbidities, mapped to complementary implementation frameworks. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024554221.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.