ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Design and optimisation of patient-specific porous femoral stems.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTotal hip replacement surgery is a well-established intervention that restores joint function and provides excellent outcomes for patients. In some cases, bone resorption caused by stress shielding leads to implant loosening. Stress shielding occurs because implants are much stiffer than bone and transmit a significant proportion of the load, leaving the surrounding bone to carry less load compared to an intact femur.
methodsTo address stress shielding, we aimed to design patient-specific additively manufactured porous femoral stems with reduced stiffness. Diamond lattice structure test specimens of varying porosities were manufactured and tested to measure elastic moduli and yield strengths. These properties were used in subsequent implant optimisation based on finite element analysis. Four implant templates were created based on the region of the implant that was assigned porous material. These templates were referred to as fully porous (FP), proximally porous with a solid distal end (PP), solid distal shell (DS), and fully solid shell (SS). In addition, the elastic modulus within the porous region was assigned either a linear or a radial distribution, resulting in eight possible implant designs.
resultsOptimisation yielded six distinct solutions, which were evaluated based on the reduction in stress shielding and micromotion at the bone implant interface. While all implant designs reduced stress shielding compared to a solid implant, only the PP and SS stems were predicted to pass the standard fatigue test for femoral stems (ISO 7206-4). Implant-bone micromotion was conducive for bone implant integration for all designs, with the potential exception of the fully porous stem. Of the implants that were predicted to pass the fatigue test, the linear proximal porous stem resulted in the largest reduction in stress shielding (9.5% for walking, 8.1% for stair climbing).
conclusionsBased on patient-specific computational models, the porous region of the stems influenced the reduction of stress shielding compared to fully solid stems. Considering implant fatigue failure and bone-implant micromotion, the PP and SS templates were found to be the most suitable design approaches to address femoral bone stress shielding after total hip replacement. Further investigation is required to fully comprehend the implications of porous femoral stems on long-term implant stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.