Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239446›Full record

ReviewMicrobial cell factories2025

Genetic tools for engineering Zymomonas mobilis, Cereibacter sphaeroides and Novosphingobium aromaticivorans to improve production of bioenergy compounds.

Shikha Mishra, Vishwajit Kumar, Jyotsna Misra, Amritha K P, Balendra Sah, Piyush Behari Lal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial cell factories, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shikha MishraCenter for Emerging and Tropical Diseases, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal, India.
Vishwajit KumarCenter for Emerging and Tropical Diseases, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal, India.
Jyotsna MisraDepartment of Biotechnology, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, 248002, Uttarakhand, India.
Amritha K PManipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.
Balendra SahDOE, Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, 53706, USA. bsah@wisc.edu.
Piyush Behari LalCenter for Emerging and Tropical Diseases, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal, India. piyush.lal@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited genetic tools for non-model bacteria are one of the limiting factors for genetic studies. This review compiles genetic tools used for three non-model alpha-proteobacteria, such as Zymomonas mobilis, Cereibacter (Rhodobacter) sphaeroides, and Novosphingobium aromaticivorans, which hold significant potential to produce industrially essential bioenergy compounds due to their distinctive metabolic pathways and resilience in extreme environments. Each of these strains has a unique genetic profile that enables them to efficiently carry out key reactions relevant to producing bioenergy compounds, such as converting sugars into bioenergy compounds and breaking down lignotoxins. Genetic tools can further optimize these strains for enhanced bioenergy compound production. This review explores the metabolic advantages of these organisms. It highlights the available array of genetic toolkits that can be shared among them to unlock their full potential for sustainable biofuel production.

Indexed as

BiofuelsGenetic EngineeringMetabolic EngineeringRhodobacter sphaeroidesSphingomonadaceaeZymomonasMetabolic Networks and PathwaysBiofuelsBiofuelCereibacter sphaeroidesMetabolic engineeringNovosphingobium aromaticivoransZymomonas mobilis

Identifiers

PMID41239446
PMCPMC12619356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.