ArticleBMC medical education2025
The clinical placement learning environment: a cross-sectional study of the perception of third- and fourth-year medical imaging students in Ghana.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical placements are critical in bridging theoretical knowledge and practical skill gaps in medical imaging education. This study evaluated the perceptions of the clinical placement learning environment among third- and fourth-year medical imaging students in Ghana.
methodsA quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted through a self-administered questionnaire created using Google Forms. A convenience sampling strategy was employed, and the link to the Google Form was distributed via the WhatsApp platform of Medical Imaging students. The survey evaluated supervision and support, learning integration, and clinical environment equity among the participants. Descriptive and Spearman's rank correlation (P < .001) were used to analyse the data.
resultsA total of 253 radiography students participated, with the majority being male (65.2%) and aged 18-24 years (85.8%). Significant associations were noted in supervision and support (p < .001), learning integration (p < .001), and learning environment equity (p < .001). However, perceived challenges such as overcrowding (25.9%), increased workload (25.5%), and equipment breakdowns (18.9%) were significant concerns. Significant associations were observed among the measured variables (that is, supervision and support, learning and integration and learning environment equity) (p < .01).
conclusionWhile students generally reported positive experiences, challenges such as overcrowding, limited supervision, and resource constraints hinder optimal learning. Addressing these issues through a timely and effective maintenance culture, improved infrastructure, and enhanced coordination between academic and clinical settings is crucial for fostering a supportive and equitable clinical placement environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.