SynthesisVirology journal2025
Incubation periods and mortality outcomes following rabies virus infection in mesocarnivorous reservoir hosts: implications for experimental design and veterinary policy - a review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Virology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rabies and Pinnipeds Reviewed: Premonitions, Perturbations, and Projections?Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEfficacy studies are part of the regulatory requirements for obtaining marketing authorization for rabies virus vaccines intended for veterinary use. However, increasing emphasis on animal welfare and the application of the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) may prompt a critical reassessment of current standards for such studies. A substantial amount of data from numerous published experimental studies is available, which could be used to reconsider or refine existing specifications and protocols-particularly concerning observation periods post-infection (pi) and dose-finding studies.
methodsTo support this reassessment, we analyzed data from 289 published experimental studies. These studies covered both susceptibility and efficacy investigations across 16 mesocarnivorous target species considered for parenteral or oral rabies vaccination. The species represented seven taxonomic families or orders: Canidae, Didelphidae, Felidae, Herpestidae, Mephitidae, Musteloidea, and Procyonidae. The dataset included 1,171 records encompassing a total of 8,381 animals that had been vaccinated with either rabies virus (RABV) or non-RABV lyssaviruses. Parametric distributions (log-normal, Weibull, and gamma) were fitted to incubation periods to examine group differences. Additionally, multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify key variables influencing incubation duration, post-infection survival, and inter-species differences among reservoir hosts.
resultsThe analyses revealed that viral strain, inoculation dose, and application site were consistently associated with incubation period length and mortality across most taxonomic groups. These variables significantly influenced incubation periods and survival rates post-infection. Notable differences were also observed between reservoir host species, highlighting the importance of species-specific factors in study design and interpretation.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that, in alignment with the 3Rs principle, existing animal models used in rabies vaccine efficacy research can be reconsidered and potentially refined. These refinements may not only enhance scientific validity but also contribute to ethical improvements in study design. Furthermore, the results may inform future risk assessments related to the importation of pets from rabies-endemic regions and support more humane, evidence-based approaches to vaccine evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.