ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025
Advanced non-invasive respiratory support in resource-constrained settings: a narrative review.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in thoracic anesthesia: lung protection, airway management, and enhanced recovery-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- The Impact of Rurality on Durable Medical Equipment Access and Discharge Planning for Tracheostomy and Ventilation Care in Nebraska.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Does SOFA-2 improve mortality prediction in sepsis? A retrospective single-center observational cohort study comparing SOFA-1 and SOFA-2.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Bridging the Evidence-Practice Gap in Early Burn Injury Care: A Comprehensive Evidence Synthesis of Global Guidelines, Consensus, and Systematic Reviews for Resource-Limited Settings.European burn journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced non-invasive respiratory support techniques include high flow oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and non-invasive ventilation. Given their relative simplicity and lower resource intensity as compared with invasive mechanical ventilation, these mechanisms of respiratory support represent an attractive opportunity for use in patients with acute respiratory failure in resource-constrained settings. High flow oxygen in particular has the potential to provide high levels of respiratory support with relatively low levels of human and other resources to a wide variety of patients with respiratory failure, including those with delirium or obtundation. Even after the COVID-19 pandemic, during which utilization of these techniques increased in high-income countries, low and lower-middle income countries still have little access to advanced non-invasive respiratory support. Evidence from high-income countries and limited evidence from low-income countries suggest that these respiratory support methods may be particularly beneficial in resource-constrained settings; however, the evidence also suggests that the populations chosen and particularly the attention and resources invested in implementation are critical in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of non-invasive support. While non-invasive respiratory support does not require the complex training and monitoring needed for invasive support (e.g. specific risks associated with the endotracheal tube, sequelae of sedation, complex ventilator modes), it nonetheless requires resources in order to be applied effectively. Particular domains that need careful consideration are: clinical systems of care; oxygen consumption and connector compatibilities; human resources and training; location within the hospital; acceptability; cost; and device characteristics. In addition, ongoing research is needed that includes randomized controlled trials with attention to context, so that clinicians in resource-constrained settings can apply relevant evidence for non-invasive respiratory support for patients in their settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.