Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239375›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

Advanced non-invasive respiratory support in resource-constrained settings: a narrative review.

Theogene Twagirumugabe, Dona Fabiola Gashame, Doris Lorette Uwamahoro, Elisabeth Riviello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theogene TwagirumugabeUniversity Teaching Hospital of Butare, Butare, Rwanda.
Dona Fabiola GashameUniversity Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda.
Doris Lorette UwamahoroCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Elisabeth RivielloDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. eriviell@bidmc.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced non-invasive respiratory support techniques include high flow oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and non-invasive ventilation. Given their relative simplicity and lower resource intensity as compared with invasive mechanical ventilation, these mechanisms of respiratory support represent an attractive opportunity for use in patients with acute respiratory failure in resource-constrained settings. High flow oxygen in particular has the potential to provide high levels of respiratory support with relatively low levels of human and other resources to a wide variety of patients with respiratory failure, including those with delirium or obtundation. Even after the COVID-19 pandemic, during which utilization of these techniques increased in high-income countries, low and lower-middle income countries still have little access to advanced non-invasive respiratory support. Evidence from high-income countries and limited evidence from low-income countries suggest that these respiratory support methods may be particularly beneficial in resource-constrained settings; however, the evidence also suggests that the populations chosen and particularly the attention and resources invested in implementation are critical in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of non-invasive support. While non-invasive respiratory support does not require the complex training and monitoring needed for invasive support (e.g. specific risks associated with the endotracheal tube, sequelae of sedation, complex ventilator modes), it nonetheless requires resources in order to be applied effectively. Particular domains that need careful consideration are: clinical systems of care; oxygen consumption and connector compatibilities; human resources and training; location within the hospital; acceptability; cost; and device characteristics. In addition, ongoing research is needed that includes randomized controlled trials with attention to context, so that clinicians in resource-constrained settings can apply relevant evidence for non-invasive respiratory support for patients in their settings.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesNoninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyCOVID-19Developing CountriesHumans

Identifiers

PMID41239375
PMCPMC12619447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.