ArticleBMC medical genomics2025
RNA sequencing provides functional insights and diagnostic resolution in previously unsolved rare disease cases.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications.Research square · 2026Article
- Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Special Issue "Molecular Progression in Genome-Related Diseases".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exome and genome sequencing have greatly improved the diagnosis of rare genetic disorders but remain limited in their ability to identify and classify non-coding variants, including intronic variants, cryptic splice-site alterations, and disruptions in regulatory regions. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful tool to bridge this gap by providing functional insights into genomic variants that disrupt splicing or gene expression, thereby aiding in variant interpretation and classification. We retrospectively reviewed 30 cases from the Utah Penelope Program and the Undiagnosed Diseases Network over a three-year period, in which RNA-seq was performed on whole blood and/or fibroblasts following either negative DNA sequencing or the identification of candidate variants requiring functional assessment. In these cases, RNA-seq identified exon skipping, cryptic splice-site activation, and intron retention, leading to transcript disruption. Additionally, positional enrichment analysis clarified X-inactivation patterns and dosage effects, confirming the pathogenicity of copy number variants. By detecting these transcript-level alterations, RNA-seq provided functional evidence supporting the reclassification of multiple variants of uncertain significance, contributing to diagnostic resolution in selected cases. This study underscores the clinical utility of RNA-seq in detecting splicing and regulatory defects that DNA sequencing and predictive tools alone cannot resolve. Integrating RNA-seq into clinical workflows can support variant classification, aid in diagnostic resolution for selected cases, and provide mechanistic insights into genetic disorders, contributing to patient care and genetic counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.