Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239361›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Changes in knee outcome measures following later-stage exercise interventions implemented ≤ 12 weeks vs. > 12 weeks after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Phunsuk Kantha, Roongtiwa Vachalathiti, Jim Richards, Wanlop Kunanusornchai, Nantuchporn Khambunruang, Sarinda Sataman, Komsak Sinsurin

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Phunsuk KanthaResearch and Innovation Center of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Roongtiwa VachalathitiMusculoskeletal Physical Therapy Research Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Jim RichardsSchool of Health, Social Work and Sport, University of Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Wanlop KunanusornchaiGeriatric Physical Therapy Research Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Nantuchporn KhambunruangPhysical Therapy Center, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sarinda SatamanPhysical Therapy Center, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Komsak SinsurinBiomechanics and Sports Research Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. komsak.sin@mahidol.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLater-stage exercise interventions refer to rehabilitation exercises implemented after the initial healing phase. Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients generally begin these high-intensity exercises at the 2-month mark. Nevertheless, the duration of these exercise programs varies across studies, and the extent to which later-stage exercises contribute to improvements in the knee outcome measures over time remains unclear. This study aims to systematically evaluate the changes in the knee outcome measures following later-stage exercise interventions implemented at ≤ 12 weeks versus > 12 weeks after TKA.

methodsThe PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched through May 2025 to identify the randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of later-stage exercise interventions on the knee outcome measures. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Additionally, the completeness of the intervention descriptions was evaluated using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist. A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes of interventions lasting ≤ 12 weeks with those lasting > 12 weeks. Moreover, the minimal detectable change (MDC) values were referenced to interpret the clinical relevance of the observed changes.

resultsFifteen studies involving 1,160 TKA patients were included. Across all studies, the sit-to-stand performance was observed to be enhanced by 2.61 s or 2.7 repetitions; the stair climbing duration decreased by 3.35 s; the knee flexor strength increased by 3.36 kg-force; and the knee extension angle reduced by 3.96°. For interventions ≤ 12 weeks, the timed up-and-go improved by 2.78 s. For interventions > 12 weeks, the knee extensor strength increased by 15.59 kg-force, and the knee flexion angle improved by 14.40°. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate, and the intervention descriptions demonstrated moderate completeness.

conclusionMany observed changes in the knee outcome measures exceeded the MDC thresholds, indicating clinically meaningful benefits from later-stage exercise interventions post-TKA. The interventions implemented at ≤ 12 weeks primarily improved the functional performance, whereas those lasting > 12 weeks resulted in greater gains in the muscle strength and joint flexibility. Stronger evidence and more detailed intervention descriptions are needed to better integrate these findings into rehabilitation practice.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeExercise TherapyKnee JointHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeExerciseFunctional performanceKnee arthroplastyMuscle strengthOutcome assessment

Identifiers

PMID41239361
PMCPMC12619201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.