ArticleBMC cancer2025
Facilitator and barrier perspectives on learning and implementing high-resolution anoscopy in Abuja, Nigeria: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HPV awareness and anal cancer prevention among sexual minority men living with HIV in Nigeria: insights from an affirming clinical setting.Sexual health · 2026Article
- Application of the Cascade of Care Framework to Guide Evidence-Informed Implementation of Anal Cancer Screening Guidelines.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection and treatment of anal precancer via high resolution anoscopy (HRA) is paramount to prevent anal cancer, particularly for populations at heightened risk like sexual minority men (SMM) living with HIV. Successful training and sustainability of cancer screening requires attention to local contexts, best captured by qualitative research. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study investigated factors that challenged or fostered learning and implementing HRA across a variety of stakeholder groups in Abuja, Nigeria.
methodsUsing in-depth qualitative methodology, nineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted in September 2023 with stakeholders - patients who underwent HRA, HRA providers, and health system representatives in Nigeria. Thematic analysis, guided by CFIR, was employed to identify key themes related to the barriers and facilitators to practicing HRA as guided by the International Anal Neoplasia Society.
resultsEight themes were identified across three domains. Barriers included low knowledge and understanding of HRA, with participants explicitly noting the need for more research in low resource settings to garner local acceptance. Participants were concerned about financial costs for the clinic and the patients. Facilitators included organizational buy-in, SMM social networks, and a safe clinic environment to support HRA engagement. Facilitators important for sustainability included acceptance of the research evidence for HRA and recognition of the health benefits. Overall, participants from all stakeholder groups welcomed HRA as a new evidence-based intervention as part of HIV care services.
conclusionsOur study highlighted the need for localized research, cultural sensitivity, and resource allocation to improve the adoption of HRA in a Nigerian HIV care setting. Organizational buy-in, community engagement, and safe healthcare environments facilitated trust and patient engagement and would promote long term sustainability. Overall, the study provided perspectives from various stakeholders that strengthen clinical proficiency and sustainability of anal cancer screening in Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.