ArticleBMC nursing2025
Exploring barriers to evidence-based nursing practice in a developing yet promising nation: a qualitative study from China.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitators and barriers to innovation and research capacity among clinical nurses: A qualitative systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Pioneering leadership competencies for evidence-based nursing in China: a groundbreaking application of effective leadership theory.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Undergraduate nursing students' experiences with evidence-based practice during clinical internship: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Actual Scope of Nursing Practice and the Influencing Factors: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study in China.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Self-Leadership Based on Caring in Primary Nursing: Developing and Validating a Conceptual Model Through a Delphi Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based nursing practice (EBNP) has emerged as a key strategy for improving healthcare services across various countries. However, the effectiveness of its implementation is substantially influenced by contextual factors within the health environment. While numerous barriers have been explored within advanced healthcare systems, the situation in China, where the development of EBNP is progressing slowly despite high demand of medical services, has not been adequately examined. This study aims to identify the barriers to implementing EBNP from an integrated perspective and to provide insights that can assist policymakers in designing effective strategies for the implementation of EBNP in China.
methodsA descriptive qualitative approach was employed, utilizing in-depth semi-structured interviews. We conducted interviews with 71 participants, including educators, hospital managers, nursing directors, and nurses from 18 Chinese provinces. Content analysis was performed using an inductive approach.
resultsThirteen barriers to implementing EBNP were identified across educational, organizational, and operational levels. Key barriers include the lack of collaboration between university and hospital to establish EBNP platform, insufficient courses to obtain EBNP knowledge and skills, and lack of performance incentives for EBNP. Respondents highlighted that the gap between theoretical and clinical practice in medical education plays a fundamental role in obstructing the successful implementation of EBNP.
conclusionsThis study underscores the barriers to EBNP implementation from an integrated perspective, addressing challenges at educational, organizational, and operational levels. Our findings provide valuable implications for enhancing the implementation of EBNP in China and similar contexts, offering guidance for future policy development and healthcare practices. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.