ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Truth-telling and devastating disclosures Navigating the tension between ethical and cultural obligations in Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expedient truth-telling in the ICU: a qualitative content analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTruth-telling is the process by which relevant medical information is disclosed to the patient to enable them to make informed decisions about their healthcare. It serves multiple aims; first, it is essential to adequately informed consent; second, it respects patients' rights to self-determination, third, it fulfills practitioners' ethical obligations; and fourth, it promotes trust between patients and practitioners. In Saudi Arabia, research suggests that patients support truth-telling, prefer a more collaborative role in decision-making, and want to be involved in difficult decisions at the end-of-life. However, evidence also finds a disparity between the preferences of patients and their relatives, with family members favoring concealment of information to honor and protect patients. The perspectives of Saudi physicians, and the challenges they encounter when faced with these oft-contrasting preferences is not as well explored.
methodsThis research is a qualitative phenomenological study that utilizes a semi-structured interview technique and interview guide. Through thematic analysis of 7 in-person interviews with senior Saudi physicians, this qualitative study attempts to understand the experiences of practitioners who routinely encounter truth-telling dilemmas, particularly in the face of strong family opposition.
resultsStudy participants identified family requests for concealment as significant ethical challenges in their practice. They reported experiencing moral conflict between the ethical duty of truth-telling and the cultural norms of a family-based Saudi society that favor concealment.
conclusionsAlthough some participants held firm in upholding the ethical duty of truth-telling, others agreed to conceal information. Most participants, however, tried to find a compromise between these contrasting commitments by relying on their own personal experiences and professional judgements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.