Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239306›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Pre and Post Menstruation Cognitive Functioning in Women with remenstrual Dysphoric Disorder, Premenstrual Syndrome and Controls: A Quasi Experimental Study.

Hifza Rabbani, Siddrah Irfan, Saeeda Khanum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hifza RabbaniDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Siddrah IrfanDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan. siddrah.irfan@gmail.com.
Saeeda KhanumDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInconsistent findings regarding the cognitive impact of Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) limit understanding of their effects on women's daily lives. These inconsistencies may arise from neglecting menstrual phase in cognitive assessments. Considering the significant impact of PMS/PMDD on work, academics, and relationships, clarifying their cognitive effects is essential for targeted interventions and improved quality of life. This study investigates the cognitive impacts of these conditions, focusing on the influence of menstrual phase.

methodsUsing a Google Form for initial data collection, 60 participants (mean age 24.47) were categorized into Control, PMS, and PMDD groups based on their responses. Cognitive performance was gauged using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), administered during two distinct menstrual phases: luteal and follicular.

resultsKey findings revealed pronounced cognitive differences across these phases, with the most significant disparities observed in the PMDD group, suggesting a gradient effect where PMDD individuals exhibited the most considerable cognitive shifts (p < .001, η²p = .25). The study's overarching results highlighted a significant divergence in cognitive functioning during the luteal phase, a time historically linked with heightened symptomology in women with PMS and PMDD. Notably, specific cognitive functions, especially language (p < .000) and abstraction (p < .001), showed significant improvement during the follicular phase across all groups (η²p = .25) - a novel finding not assessed in earlier studies.

conclusionsThis study reveals significant cognitive fluctuations across the menstrual cycle, particularly in women with PMDD, and novel improvements in language and abstraction during the follicular phase. Despite limitations, these findings emphasize the importance of considering menstrual phase in assessing and treating women with PMS/PMDD. Further rigorous research is needed to elucidate the neural mechanisms driving these cognitive changes, enabling targeted interventions to improve well-being and functional capacity. The research had its limitations, including a limited sample size, the non-random nature of the sampling method, and potential issues with the tools used for assessments. Despite these constraints, the study provides a foundation for future research, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of the neural mechanisms influenced by menstrual phases and offering insights to better support affected women.

Indexed as

CognitionMenstrual CycleMenstruationPremenstrual Dysphoric DisorderPremenstrual SyndromeAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLuteal PhaseQuality of LifeYoung AdultAbstractionCognitive functioningLanguageMontreal cognitive assessmentPremenstrual dysphoric disorderPremenstrual syndromeQuasi-Experimental study design

Identifiers

PMID41239306
PMCPMC12619304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.