ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
The impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant enterobacterales colonization on fluoroquinolone prophylaxis efficacy in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) carries a high infection risk, especially pre-engraftment. Fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis is common, but rising FQ-resistant Enterobacterales (FQRE) rates may limit its effectiveness. This study evaluated febrile neutropenia, bacteremia, and mortality in HCT patients based on FQ prophylaxis and FQRE colonization.
methodsA retrospective analysis of HCT recipients at a tertiary center in Lebanon (2017–2022) was performed. Patients receiving FQ prophylaxis during neutropenia were compared with those who did not. FQRE colonization was monitored through weekly perianal swabs post-transplant.
resultsOf 156 HCT recipients (mean age 54 years; 61% males), 73.1% received FQ prophylaxis, and 39% had FQRE colonization. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 86%, more frequently in non-prophylaxis and FQRE-colonized patients, though prophylaxis delayed its onset within 10 days post-transplant. Bacteremia affected 39.1% of 64 eligible patients, with lower rates in the prophylaxis group (35.7% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.02). Escherichia coli and coagulase-negative staphylococci predominated. All-cause mortality was 3.8%, with pneumonia and Clostridioides difficile infections in 5.1% and 3.2%, respectively; prophylaxis showed non-significant reductions in these outcomes.
conclusionFQ prophylaxis reduced febrile neutropenia and bacteremia in HCT recipients, including those colonized with FQRE. Larger studies are needed to confirm its effects on multiple outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.