ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Application of an individualized nomogram in the first-trimester for predicting cleft lip and palate.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFetal cleft lip and palate (CLP) is among the most common congenital craniofacial anomalies, posing significant physical and psychological burdens on affected families and contributing to increased societal and healthcare costs. We aimed to develop an individualized nomogram model incorporating fetal nuchal translucency thickness (NT), crown-rump length (CRL), and facial profile markers for predicting CLP in the first trimester of pregnancy.
methodsSingleton pregnancies undergoing first-trimester screening (11+0 to 13+6 weeks) were enrolled. Fetal NT, CRL, and ultrasonographic facial markers, including the frontomaxillary facial angle (FMFA) and inferior facial angle (IFA), were measured. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm, followed by multivariable analysis to establish a nomogram model. The model's diagnostic performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) curves, calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and area under the PR curve (AUPRC). Calibration curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate model calibration and clinical utility. Performance was compared with individual ultrasonographic facial markers.
resultsA total of 764 fetuses were included, comprising 732 normal and 32 CLP cases. The nomogram demonstrated excellent predictive performance with an AUC of 0.847 (95% CI: 0.751-0.944) and AUPRC of 0.689. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.977, F1-score of 0.640, sensitivity of 0.482, specificity of 0.999, positive predictive value of 0.955, and negative predictive value of 0.978. Compared to FMFA (AUC = 0.757), IFA (AUC = 0.708), NT (AUC = 0.714), and CRL (AUC = 0.592), the nomogram demonstrated significantly improved diagnostic performance (both P < 0.05). DCA confirmed the net clinical benefit of the model, and the calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes.
conclusionThe nomogram model integrating NT ≥ 2.5 mm, FMFA, CRL, and IFA demonstrates superior diagnostic performance for the first-trimester predicting of CLP compared with individual markers. Given its reliance on routinely measured parameters and ease of use, this model offers a practical, non-invasive, and efficient tool that may facilitate early detection of CLP in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.