Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239237›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

The difference in contralateral breast cancer and ovarian cancer risks for BRCA1 founder variant (c.5266dup, c.4035del) carriers with primary breast cancer.

Peteris Loza, Arvids Irmejs, Zanda Daneberga, Jelena Maksimenko, Genadijs Trofimovics, Signe Subatniece, Jacek Gronwald, Jan Lubinski, Janis Gardovskis

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peteris LozaInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia. peteris.loza@gmail.com.
Arvids IrmejsInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Zanda DanebergaInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Jelena MaksimenkoInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Genadijs TrofimovicsInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Signe SubatnieceInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
Jacek GronwaldDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Jan LubinskiDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Janis GardovskisInstitute of Oncology and Molecular Genetics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the risks of CBC and OC following a diagnosis of PBC in carriers of founder germline PV's of BRCA1 gene (c.5266dup and c.4035del), and to evaluate the impact of age at PBC diagnosis on subsequent CBC and OC risks. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThis retrospective bicentric cohort study included 1,364 female BRCA1 PV carriers diagnosed with and PBC. The control cohort comprised 11,350 unselected female PBC cases without known BRCA1 PVs. Follow-up begun at PBC diagnosis and continued until CBC or OC occurrence, censoring at risk-reducing surgery, death, or last follow-up. Risks were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards modelling.

resultsThe 10-year cumulative risk of CBC was 3.3% in controls, 25.0% in the c.5266dup carriers, and 13.1% in the c.4035del carriers. BRCA1 PV carriers had significantly higher CBC risks compared with controls (p < 0.001), with c.5266dup conferring greater risk than c.4035del (p = 0.045). Age < 40 years at PBC diagnosis independently increased CBC risk (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.83-2.29, p < 0.001). For OC, the 10-year cumulative risk was 1.0% in controls, 13.0% in the c.5266dup carriers and 22.1% in the c.4035del carriers. BRCA1 PV carriers had higher OC risks compared with controls (p < 0.001), and c.4035del conferred higher risk than c.5266dup, (p = 0.043). Age < 40 years at PBC did not significantly affect OC risk (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.77-1.29, p = 0.23).

conclusionBoth BRCA1 founder PVs confer substantially increased risks of CBC and OC compared with the general breast cancer population. The PV c.5266dup is associated with relatively higher CBC risk and lower OC risk, whereas PV c.4035del is associated with relatively lower CBC risk but higher OC risk. Age < 40 years at PBC further increases CBC risk, but does not influence OC risk. These findings highlight the importance of PV location in refining individualized risk-reduction strategies for BRCA1 carriers.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFounder EffectGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA1c.4035delc.5266dupCBCContralateral breast cancerFounderOCOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID41239237
PMCPMC12619297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.