ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Predicting mild cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease by integrating striatal MRI radiomics with clinical features.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI), a common and impactful non-motor complication in Parkinson's disease (PD) that often precedes dementia, underscores the urgent need for early predictive tools applicable to routine clinical practice. This study aims to address this issue by investigating whether integrating striatal radiomics features from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical data can predict MCI in PD patients.
methodsBaseline T1-weighted MRI images and clinical data of 254 PD patients from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database were retrospectively analyzed. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with PD patients classified as PD-MCI or cognitively normal (PD-CN). A total of 1,316 radiomics features were extracted from the bilateral caudate nucleus (CN) and putamen (PU). After dimension reduction and feature selection, a radiomics model was constructed. Independent clinical risk factors were identified via univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and further integrated with radiomics features to develop a clinical-radiomics combined model for PD-MCI prediction. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, confusion matrix, F1 score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Correlations between key radiomics features and MoCA scores were also evaluated.
resultsAge and years of education (YOE) were identified as independent clinical risk factors for PD-MCI. The clinical-radiomics combined model outperformed the radiomics-only model in both the training and test sets, with the model incorporating the right PU (PUR) radiomics features achieving the highest AUC: 0.852 (95% CI: 0.787-0.918) in the training set and 0.790 (95% CI: 0.657-0.923) in the test set. The corresponding F1 scores were 0.704 and 0.667, respectively. Additionally, specific radiomics features showed weak but significant correlations with MoCA scores (P < 0.05).
conclusionIntegration of striatal radiomics features derived from structural MRI images with routine clinical factors demonstrates promising predictive performance for PD-MCI. The proposed clinical-radiomics combined model leverages clinically accessible resources, and its predictive value for PD-MCI establishes a preliminary foundation for subsequent related explorations. However, the model's generalizability remains unconfirmed, further validation on independent datasets is required before any consideration of its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.