ReviewEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2025
How can we encourage engagement in physical activity among older adults in Chinese diasporas? Mixed methods evidence synthesis using the COM-B model.
Review in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Barriers and facilitators to physical activity among older Chinese adults in the UK: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, 31% of adults are physically inactive, with higher rates in older adults. This situation is even more pronounced among older adults from ethnic minority backgrounds, including those from the Chinese diaspora—a rapidly growing but often overlooked population.
objectiveTo explore the barriers and facilitators to engaging in physical activity (PA) among older adults from the Chinese diaspora.
methodsA mixed-methods systematic review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology guidelines. We searched seven databases: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Sociological Abstracts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Chinese Biomedical Database in September 2024. We included qualitative and quantitative studies related to views and experiences regarding participation in PA of adults aged 50 years or older, from the Chinese diaspora. A thematic synthesis approach was used to summarise the findings. Risk of bias was assessed using MMAT, and confidence in the evidence using GRADE-CERQual. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023392522).
resultsTen qualitative studies, four quantitative cross-sectional surveys, and one mixed-methods study were included. Twenty-three factors were identified; over half had high certainty. Barriers and facilitators to PA among older Chinese adults aligned with the COM-B model: capability (e.g., health, skills, knowledge, language), opportunity (e.g., PA programme, environment, resources, social support, time), and motivation (e.g., beliefs, concerns, family harmony, enjoyment, habit, reinforcement). Unique factors included language and cultural barriers, family obligations as barriers, and family harmony as a facilitator.
conclusionThe findings of this review support the development of tailored PA promotion interventions for older adults from the Chinese diaspora by enhancing their capability, opportunity, and motivation. Interventions should incorporate culturally sensitive elements, such as promoting PA benefits through traditional Chinese philosophy, offering traditional exercise programmes, developing Chinese exercise groups, and emphasising family harmony to boost motivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.