Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41239207›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale score as a predictor of urgent trauma care and mortality in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: a 10-year nationwide validation study.

Hiroki Kokeguchi, Chiaki Toida, Taichiro Tsunoyama, Masayuki Iwashita, Yasufumi Miyake

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiroki KokeguchiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Chiaki ToidaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto-City, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan. toida-ygc@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4551-4841
Taichiro TsunoyamaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki IwashitaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasufumi MiyakeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) have high mortality rates and poor outcomes. Predicting the need for urgent interventions, as well as mortality risk, is crucial for optimizing trauma management. This study aimed to identify and validate the reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale score (rSIG) as an assessment tool for predicting urgent interventions, critical care, and mortality in patients with isolated severe TBIs.

methodsThis retrospective nationwide validation study analyzed data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2021. The population was divided into derivation (2012-2018) and validation (2019-2021) cohorts. The primary composite outcome included blood transfusions within 24 hours of hospital arrival, craniotomy or craterization, intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, tracheal intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality. The optimal rSIG cutoff for predicting urgent interventions was determined using the Youden Index, and gray-zone analysis was performed as sensitivity.

resultsA total of 42,375 patients were analyzed (derivation cohort, n = 32,483; validation cohort, n = 9,892). The optimal rSIG cutoff point for predicting urgent intervention was 16.21. When applied to the validation cohort, the model demonstrated moderate discrimination (AUC 0.655, 95% CI 0.644-0.666). For predicting surgical intervention was 16.46, yielding as AUC 0.627 (95% CI 0.614-0.639), sensitivity of 53.2%, specificity of 72.1%, positive predictive value of 29.2%, and negative predictive value of 87.7%. Patients with abnormal rSIG values ( < 16.21) had significantly higher rates of urgent interventions, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality (all p < 0.01). In the gray-zone analysis, rSIG values ≤6, 6-35, and ≥35 defined high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups, respectively; the high-risk group showed the greatest need for urgent trauma care and highest mortality (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe rSIG may serve as a simple and practical indicator for predicting urgent interventions, critical care, and mortality in patients with isolated severe TBIs. Its simplicity and rapid calculability support its potential use as a triage tool in prehospital settings and as a clinical diagnostic aid in hospital environments.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticGlasgow Coma ScaleAdultAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesCritical careEmergency careJapan Trauma Data BankReverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale scoreTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID41239207
PMCPMC12619260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.