ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Impact of deep learning based reconstruction algorithms on CT radiomic features of carotid plaques.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of deep learning based reconstruction algorithms on CT radiomic features of carotid plaques.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRadiomics is increasingly applied in carotid plaques analysis to evaluate plaque characteristics and predict cardiovascular risk. However, the influence of different image reconstruction algorithms, particularly deep learning reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASIR-V), on the reproducibility of radiomic features remains poorly understood. PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of DLIR and ASIR-V on CT radiomic features of carotid plaques.
methods76 patients with 104 carotid plaques who underwent head & neck CT angiography were retrospectively enrolled. Images were reconstructed by filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V (30%, 50%, and 80%) and DLIR (DL, DM, and DH). A total of 214 CT-based radiomic features were organized by statistic family (18 first-order; 75 texture: 24 GLCM, 14 GLDM, 16 GLRLM, 16 GLSZM, and 5 NGTDM) and transform domain (original and wavelet sub-bands); 121 features were extracted from wavelet sub-bands. Features were extracted from both 2D and 3D plaque images. The reliability of feature extraction was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsDifferent reconstruction algorithms influenced the most radiomic features. The percentages of first-order, texture, and features in the wavelet domain without statistical difference among 2D and 3D lesions for all seven groups were 0% (0/18), 12.0% (9/75), and 14.9% (18/121), respectively. Compared with FBP, the unaffected features for AV30%, 50%, and 80% decreased from 99.8% and 95.1% to 81.3%, and for DL, DM, and DH from 75.5% and 52.3% to 40.7%. Across statistic families, texture features were the most stable in pairwise comparisons in both the original and wavelet domains. Unaffected features in 2D lesion were larger than 3D lesion. The consistency of first-order feature in 3D lesion was excellent in both intra- and inter-observer, with ICC values ranging from 0.865 to 1 and 0.790 to 0.999, respectively.
conclusionBoth ASIR-V and DLIR algorithms profoundly impact carotid plaque radiomics, with higher strengths exacerbating feature instability. Texture features exhibited superior robustness across all reconstruction protocols. Our findings advocate for a stability-driven approach to model development: prioritizing robust texture features and employing lower-strength DLIR are crucial steps to ensure the generalizability of radiomic biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.