ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026
Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Various Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Using a Novel Composite Method for the Analysis and Reporting of Uncorrected Distance, Intermediate, and Near Visual Acuities.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07008768 (Visual Outcome After Implantation of Three Different Presbyopia-correcting IOLs and Monofocal IOL), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Visual Outcome After Implantation of Three Different Presbyopia-correcting IOLs and Monofocal IOL
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preoperative Higher-Order Aberrations as Predictors of Visual Acuity Changes Following Presbyopia-Correcting (PCIOL) and Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis work aims to monitor the stability of composite descriptors of uncorrected distance (UCDVA), intermediate (UCIVA), and near (UCNVA) logMAR acuities after uneventful phacoemulsification and presbyopia correcting intra-ocular lenses (PCIOLs) implantation.
methodsPatients implanted with AcrySof IQ PanOptix (group 1, n = 32), TECNIS Symfony (group 2, n = 35), TECNIS bifocal (group 3, n = 34), or TECNIS monofocal (comparative, group 4, n = 32) were followed up for 12 months. In each case, the errors in the composite descriptor of [I] UCDVA and UCNVA doublets (EDN = √[(UCDVA)
resultsThere were small changes in residual refractive errors, UCDVA, UCIVA, UCNVA, EDN, EDIN, ΔEDN, and ΔEDIN values within, or between, groups 1-3. In groups 1 to 4, respectively. (i) Between 1 week and 1 month postop, the mean (± SD, 95% CI) ΔEDN values were 0.03 (± 0.05, 0.01-0.05), 0.05 (± 0.08, 0.02-0.08), 0.04 (± 0.07, 0.02-0.06), 0.19 (± 0.14, 0.14-0.24) and the ΔEDIN values were 0.04 (± 0.06, 0.01-0.05), 0.06 (± 0.10, 0.03-0.09), 0.04 (± 0.08, 0.01-0.07), 0.23 (± 0.14, 0.18-0.28). Differences were significant (one-way ANOVA for ΔEDN, F = 20.65, p < 0.001; for ΔEDIN, F = 25.03, p < 0.001), but not after excluding group 4. (ii) Between 6 and 12 months, postop ΔEDIN values > 0.1 logMAR occurred in 3 (10%), 6 (17%), 4 (12%), and 1 (3%) of cases.
conclusionsThe changes in uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities were small and remained relatively stable 1 week following implantation with PCIOLs. Fewer than 20% of cases experienced a change in composite description of acuities > 0.1 logMAR between 6 and 12 months postop.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07008768.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.